Neonicotinoids: Major gaps and limited evidence

Boost Your Bees_24158

Back in May 2014 Oxford University’s Oxford Martin School brought together an international group of experts to review the evidence around neonicotinoids and insect pollinators.

Acting as ‘honest brokers’ they aimed to provide an independent ‘restatement’ of the evidence and its imperfections, but not directly recommend policies.

Today these experts have published an update, looking at all the evidence published in the last 18 months since the original restatement.

The debate around neonicotinoids and pollinators is still intense, but despite new research and significant advances in our understanding of the effects of neonicotinoids on insect pollinators, the conclusions of the restatement basically remain the same – that there are still major gaps in our knowledge and the science is not definitive.

The restatement looks at research showing how bees are exposed to neonicotinoids in fields, and how doses of neonicotinoids can have harmful sub-lethal impacts on bees, but the major gap in our understanding still remains whether or not this harm results in widespread declines in pollinator populations.

Professor Charles Godfray, lead author of the restatement, said: “The really big and difficult question we need to know is, are these sub-lethal effects compensated for by the buffering one gets in natural populations or are they forcing down populations of pollinators?”

The update also considers more evidence that shows that the major declines in pollinator biodiversity predate the introduction of neonicotinoids.

Chris Hartfield_275_413NFU lead on bee health and pollinator issues, Dr Chris Hartfield, said: “I think the update basically says that while our understanding has improved, the evidence base is still not conclusive enough to provide a clear single course of action.

“The update summary still talks about the major gaps in our understanding of how neonicotinoids affect pollinators at a colony and population level, and gaps in our understanding of whether the changes farmers make in response to restrictions on neonicotinoid use actually have a positive or negative effect on pollinators and pollination. This reflects the concern long held by the NFU, that the EU Commission put in place restrictions on neonicotinoid use without a clear understanding of whether they will actually benefit bee and pollinator populations.

"The last sentence of the updated restatement still makes the situation very clear – while ongoing research continues to try and improve our understanding ‘…there is still a limited evidence base to guide policymakers on how pollinator populations will be affected by neonicotinoid use or how agriculture will respond to neonicotinoid usage restrictions’.”


Last edited on: 28:10:2015

Share this story:

NFU members: Have your say

Want to share your views? You must be logged in to comment – please login here. Not a member? Join us here.

  • Posted by: Mike KettlewellPosted on: 04/11/2015 18:03:51

    Comment: Pollinator populations have declined and continue to decline. The decline predated neonicotinoids when other insecticides were used. The review of the scientific evidence is presently inconclusive but it does NOT give neonics a clean bill of health and the precautionary principle should apply. Major effects upon wildlife are usually the result of human action.

  • © 2019 - NFU Online