Farm-proofed planning policy for housing

Warwickshire farmhouse_13088

The government is promoting more house building, but not for needs of farmer and grower families and businesses. The Housing and Planning Bill makes no reference to the needs of farmers and growers, when seeking to deliver thousands more homes. The Rural Planning Review is not looking for evidence of how important access to a home is for rural productivity (the review solely asks for comments upon the conversion of farm buildings to residential use).

The ability to convert a redundant agricultural building to a home can be really helpful, but not all farm businesses have that luxury. Farmers in protected landscape areas are particularly missing out on conversion rights. Furthermore many local authorities oppose giving farmer’s conversion rights, on principle, even when they are allowing thousands of houses elsewhere. NFU members are telling us they need fairer housing policies, both from central Government and from their local councils .

All town planners need to think about the wider impact of housing on farm land and farm businesses when they plan for 1,000's more homes and to ensure farmers and growers get a fair chance to have a home too.

When our modern planning system was introduced back in 1947 it sought to plan for the food we needed as well  the homes. If we can return to positive national and local plan policy we can support our farmers and growers to run sustainable rural businesses; growing the food we need and maintaining the countryside we enjoy. To allow future generations to continue running farm businesses.

Our ten recommendations to Government could help, open the attached document to view.

NFU members: Have your say

Want to share your views? You must be logged in to comment – please login here. Not a member? Join us here.

  • Posted by: F.R. GoodenoughjPosted on: 10/03/2016 11:28:58

    Comment: One hundred years ago our village would have had about 120 population. Now it is 74. One new house atv last is being built but another was refused in my view incorrectly. Many fewer people live now in each house. So we have a population which is no longer fully viable. We do not need an urban stile estate. But over a period of perhaps twelve years about twelve more houses spread through the village to preserve its present character. Planning authorities have never got round to having a parallel sytem for rural areas which avoids urban type estates but still allows for a real housing need in rural areas.

  • © 2020 - NFUonline