NFU Online

Last edited on: 13:01:2016

Share this story:

EU debate: Raymond stresses need to guarantee competitiveness

EU Debate House of Lords_32111

Pic: Ruth Downing (Rural Pictures)
 

NFU President Meurig Raymond has continued to challenge government for more clarity on the effects of an EU exit for UK agriculture.

Speaking at the British Guild for Agricultural Journalists event at the House of Lords alongside Owen Paterson MP, Brian Gardener from Agra-Europe and finance expert Sian Edmunds, he urged politicians to demonstrate that farmers would still be competitive if Britain exits the European Union.

“Our members are asking how the government will support farming to ensure that we remain competitive following an EU exit?” Mr Raymond said last night.

“Farmers would accept a reduction in farm subsidies, as long as it was across the board. The question of fairness is crucial to our members as we don’t want to be disadvantaged compared to our EU competitors.”

After Secretary of State Liz Truss last week revealed there was no ‘Plan B’ for farm subsidies in the event of Britain leaving Europe, Mr Raymond added: “It is irresponsible not to have a Plan B; members want to know what policies will be put in place to ensure a secure future.

“There is a fear of the unknown. Will the government underwrite farming, do we honestly believe that agriculture will be underwritten to the level it is needed?

“For our members there remain some key issues which have to be answered on the importance of access to the European single market and also access to seasonal labour.”

The event saw polarised views from panellists, with Owen Paterson MP fighting the case for an EU exit.

He said: “I don’t see any sane British government slashing British farming subsidies following an exit, it would be idiotic to unilaterally slash subsidies. The idea that we exit the EU and the UK will suddenly fall into a black hole is frankly childish.”

The NFU is currently undertaking a piece of work that will show the impact of Brexit on UK farming through three different scenarios. Alongside this, we will continue to have regular local meetings with members to help them make an informed decision on the EU ‘In or Out’ debate.

_32117

Pic: Ruth Downing (Rural Pictures)


NFU members: Have your say

Want to share your views? You must be logged in to comment – please login here. Not a member? Join us here.

  • Posted by: LindaPosted on: 13/01/2016 20:52:04

    Comment: What a waste of time, money and effort - this "looking at what the UK will do in various areas if we leave the EU". Most of our children and grandchildren are embracing the EU, travelling and working freely throughout its borders. I cannot believe the British are really considering this seriously - push for reform, modernisation and democratisation: yes, yes, yes. But leave? - after all this time, all these agreements we have signed, and all the previous referendums and discussions when we, the public, said "Let's stay" - we must be the most undecided, unreliable nation in the world with the shortest memory of the other, divided Europe! What a waste it would be of all that everyone has struggled to achieve so far! How sad!
  • Posted by: Paul Brannen MEPPosted on: 14/01/2016 09:40:31

    Comment: Scottish NFU are in favour of staying in the EU.
  • Posted by: Merrick Denton-Thompson OBE FLI (Landscape InstitPosted on: 20/01/2016 20:11:32

    Comment: The NFU President is absolutely right to be concerned at the lack of planning for an exit from the EU. Successive governments have failed to ensure that the wider public fully understand the public benefits of supporting the farming community not just in providing safe affordable food, but the outstanding countryside that defines our nation. Farming also provides clean water, a haven for wildlife, resilience to climate change, fresh air, renewable energy, access for health and well being. Owen Paterson is wrong in describing the public investment into farming as a subsidy, it is an investment for all those public benefits that as yet can not be defined under simplistic and short term cost benefit analysis. Words like subsidy and the failure of Government to define public benefits just extends the divide between town and country.

  • © 2017 - NFU Online