The NFU has unveiled its vision of how British farming hopes to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040.
The NFU's new report, Achieving Net Zero: Farming’s 2040 Goal, sets out three pillars of activity that will help the industry to reach its ambitious goal. These are:
- Improving farming’s productive efficiency
- Improving land management and changing land use to capture more carbon
- Boosting renewable energy and the wider bio-economy.
The first of these pillars is about reducing emissions, using a wide variety of techniques to enhance productivity and deliver the same output or more from every farm, and working smarter to use fewer inputs.
The second is about increasing farming’s ability to capture more carbon though bigger hedgerows, more trees and woodland, enhancing soil organic matter and conserving existing carbon stores in grassland and pasture.
The third pillar involves displacing greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through bioenergy and bio-based materials such as hemp fibre and sheep’s wool.
NFU President Minette Batters said:
“There is no doubt that climate change is one of the biggest challenges of our time and rising rapidly on the political agenda both at home and globally.
“Representing British farming, we recognise our unique position as both a source and a store for greenhouse gas emissions and, importantly, how we can build on our work so far to deliver climate neutral farming in the next 20 years.
“We aspire to be producing the most climate-friendly food in the world. The carbon footprint of British red meat is only 40 per cent of the world average. And we can go further, whether that is through improving our productivity, using our own land to take up and store carbon, planting hedgerows and trees to capture even more, and boosting our renewable energy output. We know that there is no single answer to the climate change challenge facing us all.
“That is why we must work across a range of internationally recognised inventories and utilise the best available science, working in partnership with concerted support from government, stakeholders and the wider supply chain. This ‘white paper’ provides a strong foundation on which to talk to others about joining us on our journey.
“We mean what we say about delivering against this aspiration and we have a sense of urgency for what is needed to achieve it. We need to implement pilots of the new Environmental Land Management scheme and productivity scheme to see how these work practically on the ground, as they will play a key part in achieving net zero. A new shared prosperity fund for rural development also needs to be in place and support from the current Industrial Strategy is crucial.
“I am also very clear that we can deliver on our commitment to net zero while retaining, if not growing, our agricultural capacity. British farmers are proud to produce food to some of the highest standards of animal welfare and environmental protection in the world. We must avoid anything that undermines UK food production, and merely exports our greenhouse gas emissions to other parts of the world.”
Read Mrs Batters' contribution to the IPPR/WWF essay collection on net zero and nature: Putting People at the Heart of the Green Transition
Read an exclusive Guardian interview with Mrs Batters: No need to cut beef to tackle climate crisis
Frequently asked questions
More from the NFU...
- Read more about the NFU's work on net zero
- NFU reiterates its net zero aims for agriculture
- NFU President presents farming's net zero ambition in IPPR/WWF report
- NFU calls for united approach to tackle climate change
- 'Net zero' agriculture
- NFU report - Delivering for Britain: Food and Farming in the Fens
Recent Comments:
1I, and others, have a serious concern for the future viability of upland and hill farms. I believe, however, "Net Zero" could provide a valuable "alternative income" from energy production via bio-digestion of farm organic waste, and Eco system payments which would become more readily accessible.
The biggest drawback is that the holdings I seek to protect cannot afford to invest in on-farm digesters. I am looking for examples of "Community Digesters" - which would form some sort of relationship with farmers who contribute waste - possibly in the form of digestate (soil conditioner), subsidised electricity, and bio-fuels.
There are many obstacles to such a scheme, especially transportation, storage, management and biosecurity risks from using slurries and manures - but is it worth setting up a trial scheme to demonstrate the potential?
NFU Members: Have your say
Do you have a comment about this article?
Log in to have your say
If you have a question about this article:
Submit a question
Not a member?
Join us