Our response to the State of Nature Report

Pollen and nectar margin_11852

NFU Vice President Guy Smith said: “As the report acknowledges, agricultural policies of the past did focus on maximising food production resulting in the intensification of farming in the years after World War II. However, since the early 1990s, in terms of inputs and in terms of numbers of livestock and area of crops grown British agriculture has not intensified - in fact it's the reverse. 

“Therefore it makes little sense to attribute cause and effect to 'the intensification of agriculture' in the UK in the last quarter of a century when there hasn't been any.

“Other causes acknowledged in the report, such as urbanisation, climate change or increasing predator pressure need greater attention. 

“Farming in the present day is a living, breathing and dynamic industry; it produces food, delivers for the economy and takes responsibility for of the iconic British countryside. British farmers have embraced the conservation agenda. They have planted or restored 30,000km of hedgerows, they reserve the borders of their fields to plant wildflowers for birds and bees, they are ensuring cleaner water and they are using less fertiliser and pesticides than ever. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture have fallen by 16% since 1990. Two thirds of farmers have signed up for Britain's trail-blazing and world renowned agri-environment schemes.

“As proof of some success here over 130 different bird species – seven for the first time - were recorded by over 1000 participating farmers on their own farms in the Big Farmland Bird Count this year. According to RSPB figures about half these species have increased in number in the UK in recent decades. But in amongst this it is clear some bird species associated with farmland are struggling and farmers are keen to work to reverse these trends.

Guy Smith, buffer strip border_27790“The well-respected 2011 Foresight Report on the Future of Food and Farming set out very clearly the challenge of managing a food system at a time of an ‘unprecedented confluence of pressures.’  There is now a high degree of academic consensus that the world will also need to increase food production significantly to meet the needs of a growing population. This increased demand for food will have to be met using finite agricultural land, while our climate continues to change, which will inevitably place further constraints on production in many parts of the world. 

“The NFU believes the sustainable intensification of agriculture will be an important tool with which farmers will help to make a significant contribution to the challenge of both domestic and global food security. This means using a spectrum of approaches which enhance yields and other ecosystem services by promoting better use of resources. For example, using technology to precisely apply vital plant nutrients or fine-tune livestock diets to reduce waste and inefficiencies in the system.

“Good husbandry, good animal welfare and good agronomy all play a major role in balancing the need to produce food using less. This is why farmers are best-placed to be part of the solution.

“Above all we need to remember farming is here to provide one of the fundamental staples to life: food. British farmers, in particular, are proud of the high standards of production, traceability of the food they produce and their high animal welfare standards. If we undermine British farming’s competitiveness or its ability to produce food, we risk exporting food production out of Britain and increasing Britain’s reliance on imports to feed itself.”

  • Posted by: Giles StrotherPosted on: 07/11/2016 10:22:23

    Comment: There's a lot of truth here - some wonderful work is being done on many farms across the country to the benefit of local wildlife. But the SoN report states the facts - alarming declines in wildlife are still the norm, particularly in the abundance of formerly commonplace species such as moths (just an example that we happen to know a lot about through schemes like the Rothamstead long-term monitoring). It is not really honest to say that farming is not a part of the problem. Many farmers are using stewardship or voluntary measures to balance production and natural ecosystems on their land but a great many are not. It is very hard to be specific about actual figures but let's say if every farm could provide say 15% of its farmed area as good wildlife habitat (and these areas could also produce food - e.g. flower-rich meadows) then we would probably be able to halt and reverse these declines and we could all get back to enjoying the nature around us that we remember as children - and a whole lot more.

    Unless we do so, how can we claim that our intensification is sustainable? Sustainability means something that can be perpetuated for ever. Currently we are making some moves in the right direction but this is no time for complacency or pointing the finger elsewhere. The other factors mentioned above are of course important and need addressing too but we can't escape the importance of the way we produce our food. We are all responsible, producers and consumers, so let's work together to solve the problems.