The GM Question

Whilst the merits of genetically modified (GM) foodstuffs is a widely debated topic in the EU, non-edibles also face similar scrutiny.

Following objections from Cyprus to the GM carnation being imported and distributed in the EU, the European Commission asked the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) to conduct a review of its safety.

In a scientific report published on Monday 10th November 2014, the Parma-based agency reassured Cyprus on the safety of the enhanced GM carnation variety SHD-27531-4.

The panel acknowledged that the propagation (i.e. rooting) of the GM flower by individuals “cannot be excluded” but noted that, in the unlikely event that this did happen, the carnation “would not show any potential for increased survival, fitness or weediness compared with its parental line”.

Furthermore, scientists added that the potential spread of pollen from the GM cut flower to other wild flower species “cannot be eliminated but is highly unlikely to occur”. They noted that plant-to-plant gene transfer of the introduced genes to a wild line was very unlikely and that, if it did occur, production of viable seed in these hybrids leading to adverse environmental effects would also be unlikely.

Irrespective of authorisation, the question remains whether consumers are more open to the presence of GM non-edibles than they are to edible produce.