COP24 Final roundup – 'Vienna settings' and 'landing zones'

An image of sheep on a farm with a wind turbine in the background

As this year's global climate change conference draws to a close, NFU climate change adviser Dr Ceris Jones gives her thoughts on the progress made and what more work there is still to do.

The end of the first week of international climate talks and the start of the second has seen a rise in diplomatic heat as the technical negotiations hit a few buffers and national government ministers begin to arrive.

The challenge - making sure the Paris Agreement is supported by fair and balanced Rulebook that will enable us to limit global warming to 1.5°C.

What do the negotiations mean?

Like any ‘sector’, these negotiations have their own peculiar language. I have found myself bemused by talk of ‘Vienna settings’ and finding ‘landing zones’, and I wondered what it really means when a negotiator says that he is ‘extremely, extremely concerned’ by the direction of the discussions.

The furore over the IPCC 1.5 report is a case in point, when four countries - the USA, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait – objected to ‘welcoming’ it: instead, they just wanted to ‘note’ its contents. Attempts to find a compromise failed, leaving all other countries ‘deeply disappointed’.

Finding new opportunities 

Other events at the summit have provided some much needed distraction.

A New Zealand farmer, enthusiastic about the benefits of precision agriculture and the data it generates for his business, was clear about ownership of that data. “Farmers own the data and they shouldn’t give it away unless they want to”, he insisted.

At a workshop on ‘innovative sustainable finance’, speakers felt that the land use sector was a world of opportunity. For example, the Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance, which is piloting the next generation of climate finance instruments, has established an Agricultural Supply Chain Adaptation Facility.

This facility has partnered with with agri-businesses to provide small to medium-sized farmers in developing countries with technical and financial support for climate-resilient investments through their supply chains.

Solution lies in sharing research

President of the Federated Farmers of New Zealand and WFO (World Farmers' Organisation) board member, Katie Milne, felt that the sharing of research and production best practice across the world is a route to the largest biological GHG (Greenhouse Gas) emissions reduction.

There’s a lot of truth in what she said. According to a FAO report, in 2013, the emissions from dairy production alone in Ethiopia were 116Mt CO2e. In contrast, the total annual emissions from all UK agriculture are around 50Mt CO2e.

This is an example of where international collaboration amongst farmers is critical, to help and support each other in solving our common climate challenges.

More from the NFU at COP24:

Ask us a question about this page

Once you have submitted your query someone from NFU CallFirst will contact you. If needed, your query will then be passed to the appropriate NFU policy team.

You have 0 characters remaining.

By completing the form with your details on this page, you are agreeing to have this information sent to the NFU for the purposes of contacting you regarding your enquiry. Please take time to read the NFU’s Privacy Policy if you require further information.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.