The background
Over the past twelve months, a group of people from across the arable supply chain and including the NFU, have been reviewing and revising the work previously undertaken by the AHDB and others to develop a DGP.
From the start, whilst the National Crops Board has supported the potential advantages of a DGP, they have been clear a number of key principles and tests have to be met for it to work and these include:
- It must be simple to use.
- It has to offer a genuine benefit to growers.
- The IT has to be resilient and reliable for all areas and situations.
- It has to provide real-time quality feedback to growers to boost efficiency.
- The individual data included should be secure and confidential whilst the aggregate data has the potential to offer useful industry intelligence and insights.
What’s being proposed?
The proposal developed by three key groups – an Industry Leadership Group, an Industry Data Group, and an Industry Governance Group goes into more detail than can be fully summarised here, but some of the key parts of the proposal are that it is designed to deliver:
- Growers receiving crop quality results in ‘real time’ allowing time to react with increased transparency on delivery. Real time means as soon as the test results are known by the recipient they are shared with growers via the DP.
- Buyers fulfilling feed and food safety responsibilities can do so more comprehensively and efficiently.
- Data will be securely aggregated, guarding individual confidentiality and yet providing valuable insights to the advantage of the whole supply chain.
- It is a single, industry owned and controlled proposal, which replicates the current roles and responsibilities of the paper passport growers are used to. As a result, it may reduce the risk of multiple DGPs being developed by the industry which could bring greater complexity and administrative burden to growers.
- The proposal clearly sets out both the cost of developing and establishing this DGP system, and the potential benefits and savings it offers. Section 11 of the business case explores the detail of this, and allows you to think about what it would mean for your business.
- In simple terms, the business case says the development cost would be £500k, and the annual running cost would be £396k but the savings over 10 years would be £6 million.
This is just a simple summary of a detailed proposal, and we’d encourage as many of you as possible to read the information, FAQs document, and business case hosted on the AHDB website.
Next steps
The NFU Crops Board need to hear your feedback, on the proposal in general, and whether it meets the key tests and principles set out at the start of this process.
Only if widespread support is established will the AHDB Cereals and Oilseeds Sector Council consider allocating levy funds to developing the system and other funding streams be pursued.
NFU crops board chair Matt Culley said: “The industry has worked hard to develop a proposal for a Digital Grain Passport that offers a number of benefits to UK growers, and that includes a simple, secure, and reliable system for the real-time return of quality data to farm.
“The NFU has made a major contribution and worked to ensure members’ interests have remained at the forefront of the project development. But for this to proceed, we now need to hear feedback from our members, because the AHDB Sector Council will have to see widespread support before they consider allocating levy money to the project.”
Use the form on this page to submit your views to the board before 24 January.