Our trade team has summarised the key parts of the FTA that are relevant to farming:
Goods market access
The continuity agreement that the UK Government agreed with South Korea in 2021, which broadly mirrored the terms of the South Korea-EU agreement, removed tariffs on both sides for most products across the economy. The revised agreement builds upon this.
The NFU understands that for agri-food products, all tariffs remain unchanged from the 2021 agreement. This means that, with a few limited exceptions (milk powders, garlic, sweet bell peppers, unhulled barley, and rice) all British agricultural exports will be able to continue being exported to South Korea tariff-free, or will be able to export tariff free in the future depending on the original agreement.
Similarly South Korea will, with a few limited exceptions (fresh and chilled tomatoes, oranges, and rice), be able to export agricultural products tariff-free to the UK.
South Korea is a net importer of agri-food products. Domestic production is constrained by limited agricultural land availability and meets only 46% of the country's food demand, with reliance on imported products to fulfil its food and agricultural needs.
Geographical indications
GIs (geographical indications) are food, drink and agricultural products with a geographical connection, or products that are made using traditional methods that can be registered and protected as intellectual property.
The UK has more than 70 GIs on agricultural products such as West Country Farmhouse Cheddar, Welsh lamb or Stilton cheese. Recognition of GI status within the FTA ensures that the heritage and quality of a UK product is protected in South Korea.
The UK has secured an agreement from South Korea to initiate the process for recognising and protecting additional UK Geographical Indications under the upgraded FTA. This is an improvement, as the current agreement only provides GI protection for Scotch Whisky. However, the government has not yet announced which GIs will be recognised and subject to protection in South Korea.
The NFU supports maintaining a system that protects all current UK GIs to safeguard and promote high value products.
SPS standards
Under the updated agreement, all imports from South Korea will still have to meet the same UK food safety and biosecurity standards. Additionally, the UK will retain its regulatory autonomy to set its own, independent standards, ensuring it can continue to uphold high levels of protection for human, animal and plant health.
The agreement includes an upgraded article on 'Adaptation to Regional Conditions' (regionalisation), which will help maintain trade flows and facilitate the safe movement of goods where disease or pest outbreaks are present but safely managed (for example British poultry products during avian influenza outbreaks).
The government has stated that the chapter includes an expanded article on animal welfare, which represents South Korea’s most comprehensive language on this issue in any trade agreement to date. It also includes South Korea’s first-ever commitment on anti-microbial resistance in a free trade agreement. While these are positive steps, in previous FTAs, the language associated with these commitments has often been based on cooperation and not legally enforceable.
Rules of origin
Rules of origin set out the criteria that a good must meet to be recognised as 'originating' (ie, British or South Korean) and therefore benefit from the preferential tariffs agreed under this deal.
The updated rules of origin are more facilitative and could allow for greater flexibility in sourcing components from third countries for sectors such as processed food, automotive, and pharmaceuticals.
Importantly, the chapter preserves origin requirements for primary agricultural products, safeguarding the interests of British farmers.
This appears to be a mixed outcome. The NFU believes that only goods which genuinely originate in either country (or groups of countries) party to an FTA should qualify for preferential treatment. In the context of the South Korean FTA, we supported an outcome on rules of origin which encouraged the use of domestically produced raw materials and did not incentivise the use of imports any more than today.