Brexit: NFU criticises proposals for 'tariff-free trade at all costs'

Meurig Raymond_35558NFU President Meurig Raymond has criticised suggestions Britain will benefit after Brexit by pursuing global free trade at all costs and unilaterally lowering tariffs.

Mr Raymond was responding to claims published by economist Patrick Minford, who predicted a benefit to the country of £135bn from a “hard Brexit” that eliminated tariffs, and a report from the Institute of Economic Affairs recommending a policy of unilateral free trade once the UK leaves the EU.

 Mr Raymond said: “While others have raised serious questions over the assumptions and arguments made by both the IEA and Professor Minford, I have grave concerns over the implications for British food production. Under the scenarios they advocate, British farming would be severely damaged as cheaper imports are allowed in while British exports remain subject to high tariffs abroad.

 “These arguments involve a very narrow economic analysis that fails to acknowledge the benefits farming delivers to the public outside the limited confines of food prices in shops. The British public needs a viable and productive farming sector to continue to maintain and enhance the countryside they value and to provide a safe and trusted, as well as affordable, supply of British food.”

The reports come after the publication of a comprehensive review by the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute which looked at possible trade policy scenarios post-Brexit.

It showed that in the case of unilateral trade liberalisation, where all tariffs on food imports are abolished, the price, volume and value of all British agricultural commodities would fall significantly, with prices for beef falling by 45% and sheep by 29%.

Mr Raymond continued: “These outcomes would clearly have a devastating effect on British farming and, by extension, the British countryside, the rural economy and our ability to feed ourselves in an increasingly volatile world.

“When it comes to trade policy after Brexit, the interests of the British public and of British farmers are best served through maintaining a deep trading relationship with the EU.

“Negotiating subsequent trade deals with countries elsewhere in the world should then be undertaken with due care and attention to ensure domestic industries are not unfairly undermined while opening up new opportunities for exporters abroad.

 “In these uncertain times, and given the high levels of interest the public has in the way their food is produced and the impact it has on animal welfare and the environment, it is clear that the value of a thriving British farming sector to the British public far outstrips the narrow arguments for cheaper imports from overseas.”

  • Posted by: G. SharstedPosted on: 22/08/2017 17:53:58

    Comment: I value the work that the NFU are doing in representing the farmers in the U.K. Parliament does not seem to have any comprehension of the farming industry. They are very flippant with their Brexit talks. The industry will suffer terribly if no reasonable deal is struck, both in the U.K. and our EU partners. I fear for the livestock farmers, ones that have a well established herd, especially if cheap meat comes in from the US. I fear too for our countryside, the men in government do not seem to understand the important role that farmers play. Cash strapped, the first thing to go would be the environment. We have many, many issues to face and our voices should be heard.
  • Posted by: campsinobillPosted on: 23/08/2017 20:00:11

    Comment: Bring back the 1958
    Agriculture Act
  • Posted by: John hooperPosted on: 24/08/2017 11:08:08

    Comment: I can see no reason to persue this brexit folly for a moment longer! What on earth is the problem with staying in Europe, and continue to have a voice at the table to reform it.