We’ve summarised our response to this consultation as follows:
A transparent and fair approach to reserving water
The NFU strongly supports a transparent system for reserving future water rights.
Agriculture needs long-term certainty, which depends on reliable access to water to support domestic food production and investment in resilience.
We agree that early licence applications for strategic schemes are important, as they give stakeholders time to assess impacts and for compromise solutions to be proposed. However, we have concerns about using adaptive pathways to justify the need for public water supply schemes, as this could undermine sectors such as agriculture where long-term confidence to invest is essential.
NFU members are open to short-term licensing of reserved water before strategic schemes begin, provided these licences have a minimum duration of five years. They should also not be subject to mid-term change through catchment reviews, as this undermines their viability.
For non-public schemes, the NFU supports having an equivalent route to justify need but warns that there is currently no statutory plan that takes into account food production.
Recognising food production
The NFU believes that productive farmland that is dependent on abstraction should be considered ‘national critical infrastructure’, but notes that the absence of strategic planning for food production currently limits this.
The NFU supports statutory targets for food production and would welcome their inclusion in strategic assessments of water. Given its role in national security and the delivery of public goods, food production should be treated as a priority sector in future water allocation.
However, we have concerns about the proposed allocation hierarchy. National critical infrastructure must be clearly defined across sectors and should not automatically override locally or nationally important food-producing areas.
The NFU warns that the proposed hierarchy may discourage agricultural investment if alternative options are not fully considered. Confidence in the planning process, strong engagement from regional planners and fair treatment of locally important sectors are essential.
We agree that the regional tier water resource planning is the right level at which collaborative solutions should be sought between sectors and groups of abstractors. For this to be the case there will need to be sufficient funding for multi-sector planning.
Regional groups should support and inform decision-making but should not act as regulators.
Environmental safeguards
The NFU does not believe current proposals offer sufficient environmental safeguards. There is uncertainty around how future changes to licensed volumes will be managed in relation to environmental targets and infrastructure needs.
We have particular concerns about heavy reliance on modelled targets rather than ecological evidence, and a lack of guarantee that safeguards will protect both water bodies and investor confidence over asset lifetimes.
Environmental protection must sit alongside realistic, long-term abstraction certainty.
A future approach to water allocation
A future approach to water allocation must provide long-term reliability, integrate wider policy objectives, improve flexibility and technology use, and maintain transparent decision-making.
Clear communication from regulators on planned changes is essential so that abstractors can prepare adaptive solutions.
The government should set out its priorities in a national water plan, including food production alongside environmental, housing and energy needs.