Understanding the pros and cons of different methane metrics

An image of NFU Deputy President Tom Bradshaw speaking at the workshop

The NFU, together with the CIEL (Centre for Innovation Excellence in Livestock), brought together scientists, key stakeholders and NFU members to hear insights on alternative ways of accounting for methane's impact on global temperature. 

The current metric that is used around the world to understand the global warming potential of GHG (greenhouse gasses) is known as GWP100. However, it does not recognise the significant differences between short-lived gases, such as methane, and long-lived gases, such as carbon dioxide.

One alternative metric, known as GWP*, has been developed by climate change scientists at the University of Oxford and in New Zealand. This metric calculates the warming impact of the different greenhouse gases, in both the short and long term, to a greater degree of accuracy.

Hearing from the experts

A scientific overview was given by Defra Chief Scientist, Professor Gideon Henderson, and Oxford University's Professor of Geosystem Science, Myles Allen.

Delegates heard more about the pros and cons on how GWP* could practically be used and the implications for policy from Rothamsted Research and BEIS (Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy). They also received an insight into the New Zealand approach which has set a separate target for methane, reflecting its short-lived nature, under a split gas approach.

"The NFU has always argued that farming is part of the solution to tackling climate change, and is committed to the challenge."

NFU Deputy President Tom Bradshaw

Moving the debate forward

Speaking at the event, NFU Deputy President Tom Bradshaw said: “This workshop has highlighted just how complex this subject is, but we must move the debate forward.

“As a first step, our national livestock and dairy boards will be reflecting on everything they’ve heard and putting forward their recommendations. We then want to work with CIEL and others on a common industry position on this issue.

“The NFU has always argued that farming is part of the solution to tackling climate change, and is committed to the challenge, but realises our ambition goes beyond different metrics. Policy like ELMs and the SFI have to do much more for net zero.”

Read more on net zero:

Ask us a question about this page

Once you have submitted your query someone from NFU CallFirst will contact you. If needed, your query will then be passed to the appropriate NFU policy team.

You have 0 characters remaining.

By completing the form with your details on this page, you are agreeing to have this information sent to the NFU for the purposes of contacting you regarding your enquiry. Please take time to read the NFU’s Privacy Policy if you require further information.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.